apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: Nomination for commit access; Brad Nicholes
Date Tue, 27 Feb 2001 16:01:58 GMT
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> From: <rbb@covalent.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 8:39 AM
> > I agree that lighting a fire is a good thing, but I would personally
> > rather see one or two APR patches from him first.  I haven't really been
> > paying any attention to his 1.3 patches, and I'm not comfortable giving
> > out commit access without any patches to the APR list.  I do think we can
> > give him commit access if he posts one or two messages to the list though.
> I'm not quite certain how you mean.  Netware is miles from doing -anything-
> in apr.  It's not like a unix port, add a patch here or there.
> This is a wholesale port, much like the Win32 or OS2 implementations.
> Can I suggest you go back and browse some of his submissions, or simply let
> those familiar with his patches push (for or against) on this?  OTOH, if your
> concern is granting commit access without a serious commitment on his part
> to -use- the access ... then if others agree we should table and get his
> commitement from him in the form of phase-1 of a Netware port.

Sorry, my message wasn't meant as a -1, it just wasn't a +1, more like a
+0.  I understand that Netware is a complete re-write.  If Netware is
miles from doing -anything-, then why will this light a fire (just


Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131

View raw message