apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From <...@covalent.net>
Subject Re: The list...
Date Mon, 26 Feb 2001 01:17:11 GMT
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 cliffwoolley@yahoo.com wrote:

> (Assuming OtherBill's message was supposed to go to the list, not just to
> me...)
>
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
> > > At least all of the HAVE_foo_H ones, I'd think.  If there's a reasonable
> > > chance an APR client will need to do the same autoconf test, we might as
> > > well save them the trouble.  Header tests pretty easily fall into that
> > > category.
> >
> > I've fat fingered enough code today and have some things I'm trying to polish
> > up ... anyone who wants to take a crack at it is welcome (starting at apr.h
> > and working up, this time ... I had to work down to solve the hosed build,
> > which now seems reasonably more stable.)
>
> I can do this tomorrow if nobody beats me to it.  Right now I'm trying to
> figure out a respectably clean way to implement bucket reuse lists to cut
> down on mallocs/frees.

Quick question on this.  How bad is the malloc/free problem now?  I agree
the empty bucket list is a good thing, just wondering how bad we are doing
right now.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message