apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Marr <gr...@alum.wpi.edu>
Subject Re: SGI Patch 10xpatch-2.0a6-2: Reduce time resolution to 1 sec
Date Sat, 24 Feb 2001 01:05:19 GMT
At 07:52 PM 02/23/2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>From: "Greg Marr" <gregm@alum.wpi.edu>
> > Especially since they have to divide it by 1,000,000, not 100,000.
>True, that's why there is a macro for the ms value, I believe, and 
>their should be if there isn't.  Experience shows that folks having 
>to type the same digit more than twice (or dial on the telephone) 
>get it wrong more times than not.

Yes, but how do you force people to use the macro if apr_time_t is 
just a numeric type?

>Perhaps there is only one answer to the slop (and we will have slop 
>if we use seconds or microseconds, take your pick) is to hide this 
>in a structure and force folks to use inlined/macroized (based on 
>platform) implementations of the arithmetic, to assure they don't do 
>something foolish.

That was Roy's suggestion.

>I entirely disagree.  That has nothing to do with the definition of 
>time.  If you would like to restate this entire argument on the 
>computational benefits of seconds, do so.

That was the original argument for the change.

Greg Marr
"We thought you were dead."
"I was, but I'm better now." - Sheridan, "The Summoning"

View raw message