apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr/build apr_common.m4
Date Tue, 27 Feb 2001 14:03:52 GMT
Greg Stein wrote:
> No way. There is zero advantage to doing that. We *are* using
> AC_CHECK_HEADERS' for-loop, so I'm not sure what you're talking about.

That was before I saw the current rev... Agreed it doesn't make sense now :)

> The M4 thing is an unrolled recursion over
> a list, basically. Took me a long time to grok "the M4 way" and build that
> macro, I tell ya :-)

It gave me a headache and a buzz at the same time. *whew* :)

   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
          "Hell is hot, that's never been disputed by anybody."

View raw message