apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Sun, 28 Jan 2001 17:28:23 GMT
Are we not using it as we haven't come across the case where we need it yet?
If that's the case then I'll remove my +1 but from the note it looked as if
we just weren't ever using it.

david

>   @@ -62,7 +62,13 @@
>          - It ignores the "type" parameter, so toss it.
>          - The fname param is allowed to be NULL on the Unix platform.
>            Change it to always use the passed value, and check callers.
>   +        rbb says:   The type parameter is supposed to be used to
determine
>   +                    if we are working with a read/write lock or a
mutex.
>   +                    The fname parameter is essentially required if you
>   +                    want to be portable, but I dislike wasting cycles
to
>   +                    outsmart the programmer.
>            Status: david +1
>   +                rbb -1



Mime
View raw message