Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 70373 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2000 21:59:48 -0000 Received: from 3ff8faf3.dsl.flashcom.net (HELO koj.covalent.net) (63.248.250.243) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Dec 2000 21:59:48 -0000 Received: from rbb (helo=localhost) by koj.covalent.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 142KjF-0000Rn-00; Sat, 02 Dec 2000 14:01:57 -0800 Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2000 14:01:57 -0800 (PST) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj.rkbloom.net To: Greg Stein cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: copying files from other repositores (was: Re: cvs commit: apr-util/test .cvsignore Makefile.in) In-Reply-To: <20001202135724.R12166@lyra.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > > The big step, of course, is deciding how we'll move files from other > > > repositories, then going and doing it. Here are the move options, let's see > > > some voting: > > > > > > 1) copy the ,v files then remove tags on the new files. > > > 2) "cvs add" the head of the old file with a reference to the location/tag > > > > #1. We are talking about completely re-organizing the Apache tree, which > > means that the history won't be easily accessible for any of those > > files. Plus these files are actually going to live in apr-util for a long > > time, so we want as much history as we can have there. > > Argh! You are quite right! > > Okay. I'm with you and would advocate option (2). Everybody: are there any > objections to going that route? (we have two +1 votes for (1)) Please tell me you meant 1. I am perfectly willing to agree that usually we should use option #2, but this is a special case. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------