From rbb@covalent.net Tue Dec 5 22:27:03 2000 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 4982 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2000 22:27:03 -0000 Received: from sfo-gw.covalent.net (HELO koj.covalent.net) (207.44.198.62) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Dec 2000 22:27:03 -0000 Received: from rbb (helo=localhost) by koj.covalent.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 143QZd-0005Nu-00; Tue, 05 Dec 2000 14:28:33 -0800 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2000 14:28:31 -0800 (PST) From: rbb@covalent.net X-Sender: rbb@koj.rkbloom.net To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." cc: rbb@covalent.net, 'Greg Stein' , 'Cliff Woolley' , dev@apr.apache.org Subject: RE: apr-util comments In-Reply-To: <000d01c05f09$ca516450$92c0b0d0@roweclan.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Bigger issue. [just finished reviewing it myself] > > Symbols can't be wrapped by APR_DECLARE, we need to use an APU_DECLARE, or > APR_UTIL_DECLARE, or whatever. Consider; > > APR_DECLARE symbols are exported into the aprlib.dll > > apr-util.dll needs to export its symbols, and import the APR_DECLAREs. UGH! That's a real PITA. I was really hoping to not have to create another set of DECLARE macros. :-( Does apr-util.dll also export the symbols from apr.dll? If so, does that make a difference? > All I'm asking for is the symbol name, is APR_UTIL_DECLARE too wordy (and if > so, would we rather use APU_DECLARE or APRU_DECLARE?, or even AU_DECLARE) I guess if we need another one, I would suggest APU_DECLARE. Ryan _______________________________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org 406 29th St. San Francisco, CA 94131 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------