apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@covalent.net
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:23:49 GMT
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Greg Stein wrote:

> Given the mapping you list below, are you considering a tighter
> formalization of the namespaces *within* APR? For example, all file
> functions would be apr_file_* ?
> 
> I'm -0 on that, but some targeted renames (like the one below) would be a
> Good Thing.

Right now, I want to clean up the stupid functions like the one listed
below.  If other people want a tight formalization of function names, we
can talk about that.  I just really want to clean up the things that don't
make any sense.

Ryan

_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Mime
View raw message