apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@lyra.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Sun, 03 Dec 2000 05:41:27 GMT
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 11:22:54PM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > From: rbb@covalent.net [mailto:rbb@covalent.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 11:19 PM
> > 
> > > >        * API documentation
> > > >   -        Status: Ben Laurie has written some hooks documentation
> > > >   -        (apache-2.0/htdocs/hooks.html)
> > > 
> > > Q.  Now that APRUTIL exists, may we please move hooks (a 
> > generally useful
> > >     entity) into that lib (and put this issue back into util?
> > 
> > I think we are just waiting for some people on dev to decide how to move
> > the code out of Apache and into apr-utils.  Greg and I have both voted to
> > move the ,v files so that the history is preserved.

Yup. I *just* created APRUTIL last night. While Ryan and I can go hog-wild
and start shifting a bunch of code from Apache and APR over to APRUTIL, it
would be nice to at least hear a bit of other input.

I'm going to send out a detailed plan in a while. This will go to new-httpd
and to dev@apr. (I just realized that new-httpd might not be entirely keyed
in on the new package)

> +1 here, but I'll wait for consensus (assuming, of course, that we leave
> history and tags in their original location, esp. for something like ap_hooks.h)

Absolutely... have no fear on that one.

(and after the copy, the tags will be removed from new loc)

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/

Mime
View raw message