From kfogel@galois.collab.net  Mon Nov 27 01:45:43 2000
Return-Path: <kfogel@galois.collab.net>
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 56942 invoked from network); 27 Nov 2000 01:45:43 -0000
Received: from 24-148-31-194.na.21stcentury.net (HELO galois.collab.net) (root@24.148.31.194)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Nov 2000 01:45:43 -0000
Received: (from kfogel@localhost)
	by galois.collab.net (8.10.1/8.10.1/Debian 8.10.1-1) id eAQNUK614596;
	Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:30:20 -0600
To: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net>
Cc: Branko =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=C8ibej?= <brane@xbc.nu>, dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: CVS access weiredness
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011250034150.74621-100000@localhost>
Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
X-Windows: form follows malfunction.
From: Karl Fogel <kfogel@galois.collab.net>
Date: 26 Nov 2000 17:30:20 -0600
In-Reply-To: Brian Behlendorf's message of "Sat, 25 Nov 2000 00:35:55 -0800 (PST)"
Message-ID: <87y9y6z4z7.fsf@galois.collab.net>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net> writes:
> If that's correct, I don't have the first clue on how to fix it.  =)  
> Sounds more like a bug in the CVS client than anything I can fix on the
> server side; I don't know the cvs code well enough to be comfortable
> trying to fix this (nor do I really have the desire to spend the time
> diving into CVS source code, given it's not a fatal error).  But if anyone
> does track it down and it's something I can fix on the server, I'll be
> happy to do so.

It's a client problem, yes.

Given that it's not a real problem, I'm inclined to pretend it's not
happening...