On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 05:13:07PM -0600, Karl Fogel wrote:
> By the way, regarding the renaming of `apr_option_t':
>
> APR doesn't seem to be too careful with namespaces anyway
True, but "apr_option_t" is awfully generic. Options for what? Sockets?
The type name has changed since this message :-), but I thought it would be
nice to at least acknowledge your point about APR naming and to explain that
I understood that, but the name was still a bit wonky.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
|