From commits-return-12516-apmail-apr-commits-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Tue Apr 10 13:14:50 2012
Return-Path:
X-Original-To: apmail-apr-commits-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-commits-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84AD09146
for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:14:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 51135 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2012 13:14:50 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-commits-archive@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51090 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2012 13:14:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact commits-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Unsubscribe:
Reply-To: dev@apr.apache.org
List-Id:
Delivered-To: mailing list commits@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 51081 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2012 13:14:50 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:14:50 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=5.0
tests=ALL_TRUSTED
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received: from [140.211.11.4] (HELO eris.apache.org) (140.211.11.4)
by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:14:47 +0000
Received: from eris.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by eris.apache.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A01023888FE
for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:14:27 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: svn commit: r1311706 - /apr/site/trunk/xdocs/guidelines.xml
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:14:26 -0000
To: commits@apr.apache.org
From: trawick@apache.org
X-Mailer: svnmailer-1.0.8-patched
Message-Id: <20120410131427.0A01023888FE@eris.apache.org>
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Apr 10 13:14:26 2012
New Revision: 1311706
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1311706&view=rev
Log:
document procedures related to CHANGES and branch maintenance
Modified:
apr/site/trunk/xdocs/guidelines.xml
Modified: apr/site/trunk/xdocs/guidelines.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/site/trunk/xdocs/guidelines.xml?rev=1311706&r1=1311705&r2=1311706&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- apr/site/trunk/xdocs/guidelines.xml (original)
+++ apr/site/trunk/xdocs/guidelines.xml Tue Apr 10 13:14:26 2012
@@ -54,6 +54,53 @@ Then Commit" (RTC) process.
+CHANGES entries
+
+The goals for CHANGES entries are to provide this documentation
+for user-visible changes and to limit this documentation to releases
+which introduced the change. Fixes to features which have not yet been
+released don't warrant an entry as they are part of the initial release
+of the feature. CHANGES for one branch shouldn't duplicate entries for
+earlier branches except when releases introducing the fix are created
+from both branches.
+
+Modifications expected to remain only in trunk, at least for some
+time, should be accompanied by a CHANGES entry in trunk (if a CHANGES
+entry is appropriate at all).
+
+
+
+
+Branch maintenance
+
+Many changes which are committed to trunk are also delivered to other
+branches. The procedure used is outlined below.
+
+
+Commit to trunk, 1.9.x, 1.8.x, etc. down to the actively maintained
+stable branch. In cases where the actively maintained stable branch
+has recently changed, such as when moving from 1.3.x to 1.4.x in order
+to release new features, it is up to the committer to decide whether to
+commit to the previous actively maintained stable branch. (There is
+at least limited value in having the project decide what the patch for
+some branch is even if there are no clear plans to release it, as some
+users may need to continue using the previous branch for some time
+until they can vet the changes in the current branch.)
+
+Commit messages for the branches always explicitly reference the trunk
+revision. In particular, note that Subversion mergeinfo is not a
+sufficient record because it does not show up in commonly-used views of
+revision history.
+
+When a CHANGES entry is needed for the modifications committed to a
+branch, the CHANGES entry should be part of the commit, whether or not
+it was part of the trunk revision being backported. (A CHANGES entry is
+commonly omitted from the trunk commit if a backport will be performed
+almost immediately.)
+
+
+
+
PMC Membership
PMC membership is attained through a "consensus approval" process