Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-commits-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 67576 invoked from network); 7 May 2008 19:20:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 May 2008 19:20:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 53291 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2008 19:20:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-commits-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 53246 invoked by uid 500); 7 May 2008 19:20:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commits-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: dev@apr.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list commits@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 53227 invoked by uid 99); 7 May 2008 19:20:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 May 2008 12:20:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 May 2008 19:19:43 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jaguNET.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4128151718B; Wed, 7 May 2008 15:19:41 -0400 (EDT) Cc: commits@apr.apache.org Message-Id: <70FB66D8-4B1C-42DB-B058-C100D7F2D054@apache.org> From: Jim Jagielski To: dev@apr.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4821FD58.3070000@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Subject: Re: svn commit: r654185 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES network_io/unix/sendrecv.c Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 15:19:41 -0400 References: <20080507173234.EF850238898E@eris.apache.org> <4821FD58.3070000@rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Is it better to combine them both into 1 ?? On May 7, 2008, at 3:04 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > jim@apache.org wrote: >> Author: jim >> Date: Wed May 7 10:32:31 2008 >> New Revision: 654185 >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=654185&view=rev >> Log: >> Make Darwin's sendfile() really work :) > > I forgot about that CHANGES entry... Jim would you also please add > Geoff Greer to that list of helpful > people who fixed this implementation? > > Bill >