From commits-return-9052-apmail-apr-commits-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed Oct 24 13:59:02 2007
Return-Path: <commits-return-9052-apmail-apr-commits-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-commits-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 31545 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2007 13:59:02 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Oct 2007 13:59:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 43082 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2007 13:56:11 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-commits-archive@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43045 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2007 13:56:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact commits-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:commits@apr.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:commits-help@apr.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:commits-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@apr.apache.org
List-Id: <commits.apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list commits@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43021 invoked by uid 99); 24 Oct 2007 13:56:11 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:56:11 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [137.65.248.137] (HELO sinclair.provo.novell.com) (137.65.248.137)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:56:14 +0000
Received: from INET-PRV-MTA by sinclair.provo.novell.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:54:38 -0600
Message-Id: <471EFAA9.6720.00AC.0@novell.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 HP
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 07:54:31 -0600
From: "Brad Nicholes" <BNICHOLES@novell.com>
To: <dev@apr.apache.org>,"Jr. William A. Rowe" <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Cc: <commits@apr.apache.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r587694 - /apr/apr/trunk/build/NWGNUmakefile
References: <20071023232716.AE11C1A9838@eris.apache.org>
 <471E8E01.2070407@rowe-clan.net>
In-Reply-To: <471E8E01.2070407@rowe-clan.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

>>> On 10/23/2007 at 6:12 PM, in message <471E8E01.2070407@rowe-clan.net>, =
"William
A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> bnicholes@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: bnicholes
>> Date: Tue Oct 23 16:27:15 2007
>> New Revision: 587694
>>=20
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=3D587694&view=3Drev=20
>> Log:
>> Allow the dependent .hw files in the include/private directory to be=20
> processed as well.
>=20
>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@
>>  	@echo Creating $(subst /,\,$@)
>>  	copy $< $(subst /,\,$(APRUTIL))\include\private\$(@F)
>> =20
>> +$(APRUTIL)/include/private/%.h: $(subst=20
> /,\,$(APRUTIL))\include\private\%.hw
>> +	@echo Creating $(subst /,\,$@)
>> +	copy $< $(subst /,\,$(APRUTIL))\include\private\$(@F)
>> +
>>  $(APRUTIL)/xml/expat/lib/%.h: $(subst /,\,$(APRUTIL))\xml\expat\lib\%.h=
nw
>>  	@echo Creating $(subst /,\,$@)
>>  	copy $< $(subst /,\,$(APRUTIL))\xml\expat\lib\$(@F)
>=20
> Silly question, but if both exist, which rule wins?

In this case they both do.  The makefile is just copying code bits into a =
single ap_config.h.  The code bits are surrounded by #ifdef WIN32 or =
#ifdef NETWARE.  So the fact that both ap_config.hw and ap_config.hnw =
exist and both are copied, the result does the right thing.

Brad