apr-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r434327 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES include/arch/win32/apr_arch_threadproc.h misc/win32/start.c threadproc/win32/threadpriv.c
Date Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:35:13 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I thought the concensus was that the MSVC's own destructor callbacks
> were more interesting, since they would permit apr to be statically
> bound to the app?

I would really like to see the code Brane mentioned.

> On that note, doesn't this patch break if you statically link your
> app to apr *and* provide your own DllMain?

It doesn't break. It only behaves like without the patch,
cause the patch is compiled-in by #define dependent on
the DLL apr build.

> It's great to continue to discuss this on trunk, but would you please
> hold off any backporting till those questions are resolved?

Sure. I'm waiting on the trick Branko said its possible.


View raw message