apr-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jor...@apache.org
Subject svn commit: r391582 - /apr/apr/trunk/STATUS
Date Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:05:54 GMT
Author: jorton
Date: Wed Apr  5 04:05:51 2006
New Revision: 391582

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=391582&view=rev
The config.status issue was fixed recently; move a proposed API change
from bugzilla to STATUS.


Modified: apr/apr/trunk/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/apr/apr/trunk/STATUS?rev=391582&r1=391581&r2=391582&view=diff
--- apr/apr/trunk/STATUS (original)
+++ apr/apr/trunk/STATUS Wed Apr  5 04:05:51 2006
@@ -203,24 +203,6 @@
         Status: Greg +1 (volunteers)
-    * configure.in does post-processing on the AC_OUTPUT files (for
-      VPATH support). This means that config.status doesn't do the
-      right thing when you re-run it. We ought to revamp the makefiles 
-      to do the right AC_SUBST stuff rather than depend upon rewriting.
-      Sascha: As the rewriter is a crude hack, I would not worry too
-              much about it.  It is designed to go away once we have
-              a proper build system in place.
-              One of the perceived deficiencies of automake is that it
-              uses AC_SUBST too often, thereby slowing down the task of
-              generating Makefiles significantly, because it applies
-              dozens of substitutions to each Makefile.  And why?  Make's
-              built-in macro processing is much more powerful, and
-              combined with the include facility, generating Makefiles
-              becomes simpler and faster.
-      Justin says: "I think this got fixed with Roy's build changes."
     * use os_(un)cork in network_io/unix/sendrecv.c for FreeBSD's
       sendfile implementation.
@@ -420,6 +402,20 @@
         apr_lock_mech_e                  from apr_lockmech_e
         apr_time_interval_t              from apr_interval_time_t
         apr_time_interval_short_t        from apr_short_interval_time_t
+    * wrowe writes:
+      Looking at bug 32520, it occurs to me that exploding times using the
+      apr_time_exp_* functions; it would make more sense to split ->tm_usec into
+        ->tm_msec thousandths (milleseconds)
+        ->tm_usec millionths  (microseconds)
+      for most display purposes.  It's trivial to roll them together with the
+      format string %03d%03d if that's what's desired, or display simply
+      %02d.%03d if millisecond resolution is desired.  It would also shrink
+      the fields to int's so unpacking would be slightly slower, using them
+      would be slightly faster, for what's likely to be little impact on
+      performance.
 Stuff for post 1.0:

View raw message