Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-cvs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6823 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 19:13:30 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 19:13:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 84296 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2003 19:13:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-cvs-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 84202 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2003 19:13:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cvs-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: dev@apr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cvs@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 84189 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 19:13:19 -0000 Date: 26 Sep 2003 19:13:28 -0000 Message-ID: <20030926191328.6808.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> From: jwoolley@apache.org To: apr-cvs@apache.org Subject: cvs commit: apr/include apr_pools.h X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N jwoolley 2003/09/26 12:13:28 Modified: include apr_pools.h Log: clarify docs. submitted by: stas Revision Changes Path 1.107 +6 -5 apr/include/apr_pools.h Index: apr_pools.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/include/apr_pools.h,v retrieving revision 1.106 retrieving revision 1.107 diff -u -d -u -r1.106 -r1.107 --- apr_pools.h 26 Sep 2003 18:25:35 -0000 1.106 +++ apr_pools.h 26 Sep 2003 19:13:28 -0000 1.107 @@ -460,11 +460,12 @@ * * Users of APR must take EXTREME care when choosing a key to * use for their data. It is possible to accidentally overwrite - * data by choosing a key that another part of the program is using - * It is advised that steps are taken to ensure that unique keys are - * used for all of the userdata objects in a given pool at all times. - * Careful namespace prefixing of key names typically helps to ensure this - * uniqueness. + * data by choosing a key that another part of the program is using. + * Therefore it is advised that steps are taken to ensure that unique + * keys are used for all of the userdata objects in a particular pool + * (the same key in two different pools or a pool and one of its + * subpools is okay) at all times. Careful namespace prefixing of + * key names is a typical way to help ensure this uniqueness. * */ APR_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_pool_userdata_set(