Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-cvs-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 79384 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2002 01:20:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cvs-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: dev@apr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cvs@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 79373 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2002 01:20:16 -0000 Date: 12 Jul 2002 01:20:15 -0000 Message-ID: <20020712012015.18834.qmail@icarus.apache.org> From: jerenkrantz@apache.org To: apr-cvs@apache.org Subject: cvs commit: apr STATUS X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N jerenkrantz 2002/07/11 18:20:15 Modified: . STATUS Log: Reformat all votes of the same number with no explanations on the same line Revision Changes Path 1.154 +2 -5 apr/STATUS Index: STATUS =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v retrieving revision 1.153 retrieving revision 1.154 diff -u -r1.153 -r1.154 --- STATUS 12 Jul 2002 01:09:38 -0000 1.153 +++ STATUS 12 Jul 2002 01:20:14 -0000 1.154 @@ -79,10 +79,7 @@ 2) Renaming the function to get rid of apr_time_t vs time_t confusion, but keep it ambigious and make no contract with the user about the units represented. Needs a better suggestion than apr_timeval_t. - +1: aaron - +1: jwoolley - +1: brianp - +1: ianh + +1: aaron, jwoolley, brianp, ianh -0: jerenkrantz, striker -0.5: rbb, wrowe