Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-cvs-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 41609 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jul 2002 19:17:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cvs-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Reply-To: dev@apr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cvs@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 41590 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 19:17:33 -0000 Date: 11 Jul 2002 19:17:31 -0000 Message-ID: <20020711191731.5762.qmail@icarus.apache.org> From: striker@apache.org To: apr-cvs@apache.org Subject: cvs commit: apr STATUS X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N striker 2002/07/11 12:17:30 Modified: . STATUS Log: Drop in my votes on this issue. Revision Changes Path 1.138 +3 -3 apr/STATUS Index: STATUS =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v retrieving revision 1.137 retrieving revision 1.138 diff -u -r1.137 -r1.138 --- STATUS 11 Jul 2002 19:10:53 -0000 1.137 +++ STATUS 11 Jul 2002 19:17:29 -0000 1.138 @@ -64,14 +64,14 @@ 1) Keeping the existing apr_time_t names, in spite of potential ANSI/C99 time_t confusion. apr_types don't promise to be system types, or map to system units. - +1: rbb, wrowe, jerenkrantz + +1: rbb, wrowe, jerenkrantz, striker +0: brianp -1: aaron [veto for reusing the apr_time_t identifier for a new use. I'm ok with apr_timeval_t.] 2) Renaming the function to get rid of apr_time_t vs time_t confusion, which wrowe suggests apr_butime_t [binary microtime]. +1: fielding, aaron - -0: wrowe, jerenkrantz + -0: wrowe, jerenkrantz, striker -0.5: rbb -1: brianp [-1 for the apr_butime_t name specifically: let's keep the type name independent of the internal