apr-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From wr...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:53:43 GMT
wrowe       2002/07/11 17:53:43

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
    Revert the other significant response to trolling, it didn't belong in
    status.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.150     +2 -8      apr/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.149
  retrieving revision 1.150
  diff -u -r1.149 -r1.150
  --- STATUS	12 Jul 2002 00:30:59 -0000	1.149
  +++ STATUS	12 Jul 2002 00:53:43 -0000	1.150
  @@ -120,13 +120,7 @@
          Saying that apr_time_t doesn't imply seconds is to ignore the
          fact that all of those httpd functions used to create APR were
          defined in terms of seconds and make no use of microseconds.]
  -
  -      [wrowe: read code.]
  -
  -        [fielding: I read it.  I know exactly which functions from httpd
  -         that I wrote were subsequently broken when they were moved into APR.]
  -
  -      [fielding: Meanwhile, the only reason we have this stupid debate is 
  +       Meanwhile, the only reason we have this stupid debate is 
          because wrowe insists that time_t is 32 bits and therefore dies in 2038.
          In fact, time_t is 64 bits on 64bit NT, Linux, OSF, and probably
          others that I haven't checked.  In any case, since we use the
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message