apr-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ryan Bloom" <...@covalent.net>
Subject RE: cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2002 23:45:09 GMT
Can we move the discussion to the mailing list, and out of STATUS
please.  Reading a discussion in a test file is an annoying way to do
this.

Ryan

----------------------------------------------
Ryan Bloom                  rbb@covalent.net
645 Howard St.              rbb@apache.org
San Francisco, CA 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: brianp@apache.org [mailto:brianp@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 4:41 PM
> To: apr-cvs@apache.org
> Subject: cvs commit: apr STATUS
> 
> brianp      2002/07/11 16:40:48
> 
>   Modified:    .        STATUS
>   Log:
>   Comments on the time_t discussion
> 
>   Revision  Changes    Path
>   1.143     +7 -1      apr/STATUS
> 
>   Index: STATUS
>   ===================================================================
>   RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v
>   retrieving revision 1.142
>   retrieving revision 1.143
>   diff -u -r1.142 -r1.143
>   --- STATUS	11 Jul 2002 23:32:50 -0000	1.142
>   +++ STATUS	11 Jul 2002 23:40:48 -0000	1.143
>   @@ -104,6 +104,12 @@
>           system's time_t time() function to get the time value
everywhere
>           except Win32 w/SYSTEMTIME, we only ever have a resolution of
>           seconds or milliseconds.  So, why the hell are we storing
usecs?
>   +
>   +           [brianp: This is incorrect.  We use gettimeofday() in
place
>   +            of time.  It's faster than time(), and it gives us
> microseconds
>   +            in addition to seconds.  Why do you want to throw away
the
>   +            microseconds?!!]
>   +
>           We don't use them.  We don't even have display functions for
> them.
>           We have to do a stupid conversion every time we actually do
> something
>           useful with time in order to support somebody's wet dream of
a
> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message