stoddard    02/05/03 06:00:19

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  Don't throw the baby out with the bath water...
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.123     +5 -4      apr/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.122
  retrieving revision 1.123
  diff -u -r1.122 -r1.123
  --- STATUS	2 May 2002 15:22:40 -0000	1.122
  +++ STATUS	3 May 2002 13:00:19 -0000	1.123
  @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
   APACHE PORTABLE RUNTIME (APR) LIBRARY STATUS:			-*-text-*-
  -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/02 15:22:40 $]
  +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/03 13:00:19 $]
   
   Release:
   
  @@ -89,8 +89,9 @@
                     YES means you use the atomics code, based on the *build*
                     machine (and therefore carries some dependencies) or
                     NO which maintains "universal" portabiity, which is
  -                  what we have (but the default being NO atomics).
  -      -1: IanH I don't agree. I think APR is the perfect place this kind of thing. 
  +                  what we have (but the default being NO atomics)
  +      -1: IanH, BillS: 
  +                  I don't agree. I think APR is the perfect place this kind of thing. 
                     For platforms that support it is a big win, for ones which don't
                     they are no worse off than the alternative.
                     I can't maintain every asm implementation, but I am volunteering
  @@ -105,7 +106,7 @@
         advantage of compiler optimizations when the size of the block being
         passed to memset is known at compile time.
   
  -      +1: BrianP, Justin, Sander, Cliff, Ian
  +      +1: BrianP, Justin, Sander, Cliff, Ian, BillS
   
   
   RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP: