apr-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From j..@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Thu, 02 May 2002 13:50:38 GMT
jim         02/05/02 06:50:38

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  Missed the most important point of
  my ramble
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.120     +3 -2      apr/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.119
  retrieving revision 1.120
  diff -u -r1.119 -r1.120
  --- STATUS	2 May 2002 13:45:34 -0000	1.119
  +++ STATUS	2 May 2002 13:50:38 -0000	1.120
  @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
   APACHE PORTABLE RUNTIME (APR) LIBRARY STATUS:			-*-text-*-
  -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/02 13:45:34 $]
  +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/02 13:50:38 $]
   
   Release:
   
  @@ -87,7 +87,8 @@
                     real option is to make atomics a compile-time option.
                     YES means you use the atomics code, based on the *build*
                     machine (and therefore carries some dependencies) or
  -                  NO which maintains "universal" portabiity.
  +                  NO which maintains "universal" portabiity, which is
  +                  what we have (but the default being NO atomics).
         -1: IanH I don't agree. I think APR is the perfect place this kind of thing. 
                     For platforms that support it is a big win, for ones which don't
                     they are no worse off than the alternative.
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message