apr-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jerenkra...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Tue, 04 Dec 2001 00:15:52 GMT
jerenkrantz    01/12/03 16:15:52

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Log:
  I am leaning towards Sander's code because it makes the pool code clean.
  
  However, I'm going to be majorly backed up this week by finals, so let's
  start a running commentary in STATUS so that when I have time next week,
  I can keep everything straight without having to dig through the archives.
  
  If you've reviewed the code and tested it, place your votes.
  
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.71      +13 -1     apr/STATUS
  
  Index: STATUS
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.70
  retrieving revision 1.71
  diff -u -r1.70 -r1.71
  --- STATUS	2001/11/14 08:36:16	1.70
  +++ STATUS	2001/12/04 00:15:52	1.71
  @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
   APACHE PORTABLE RUNTIME (APR) LIBRARY STATUS:			-*-text-*-
  -Last modified at [$Date: 2001/11/14 08:36:16 $]
  +Last modified at [$Date: 2001/12/04 00:15:52 $]
   
   Release:
   
  @@ -43,6 +43,18 @@
                apr_proc_mutex_*() (Is proc_mutex unnecessary on Win32?)
   
   RELEASE NON-SHOWSTOPPERS BUT WOULD BE REAL NICE TO WRAP THESE UP:
  +
  +    * Enable pools to have thread-specific locking in it.
  +        Status: There are two alternatives.  More investigation/analysis
  +                needs to be done to see if they can be merged 
  +                together.
  +        Sander's submission:
  +            <JLEGKKNELMHCJPNMOKHOOECGEPAA.striker@apache.org>
  +        Brian's submission:
  +           <3C064F49.8000908@pacbell.net>
  +        Comparisons:
  +            Ian: <3C083414.1080208@cnet.com> (performance)
  +            Brian: <3C07D792.9070301@cnet.com> (code)
   
       * Get OTHER_CHILD support into Win32
           Status: Bill S. is looking into this
  
  
  

Mime
View raw message