apr-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jerenkra...@apache.org
Subject cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2001 18:46:19 GMT
jerenkrantz    01/07/26 11:46:19

  Modified:    .        STATUS
  Update STATUS file.
  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.52      +10 -13    apr/STATUS
  Index: STATUS
  RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/STATUS,v
  retrieving revision 1.51
  retrieving revision 1.52
  diff -u -r1.51 -r1.52
  --- STATUS	2001/07/26 03:59:24	1.51
  +++ STATUS	2001/07/26 18:46:19	1.52
  @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
  -Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/26 03:59:24 $]
  +Last modified at [$Date: 2001/07/26 18:46:19 $]
  @@ -26,10 +26,6 @@
       * Get OTHER_CHILD support into Win32
           Status: Bill S. is looking into this
  -    * Unconditionally setting AI_CANONNAME flag when apr_sockaddr_info_get()
  -      calls getaddrinfo() is bogus and causes undesired DNS requests.
  -        Status: Jeff will look into this
       * SysV semaphore support isn't usable by Apache when started as
         root because we don't have a way to allow the semaphore to be
         used by the configured User and Group.  Current work-around:
  @@ -116,6 +112,7 @@
       * toss the per-Makefile setup of INCLUDES; shift to rules.mk.in
       * add the rest of the pool accessor declare/impl macros.
  +      Justin says: Both thread and file have the accessors now.  Any others?
         Status: Greg volunteers
       * I think apr_open_stderr() and friends dup() the descriptor. That
  @@ -138,14 +135,9 @@
         - add more detailed tests to testmem.c
           Status: Optionally enable it with --enable-sms.  Still wildly 
                   unproven.  But, it actually works as a replacement for 
  -                pools now.  (httpd works without pools.)
  -                There is a current (non-fatal, but silly) flaw in 
  -                the trivial SMS implementation that makes it add 4KB 
  -                to each level in the allocation chain.  This is bad. 
  -                Adding a child_malloc path has been discussed.  Making
  -                the apr_sms_pools.c call with 0 for MIN_FREE has been
  -                suggested.  As has rethinking which SMSs constitute an 
  -                old-style apr_pool_t.
  +                pools now.  It may even not segfault when running httpd
  +                under high-loads.  The performance impact/benefit still
  +                needs to be examined.
       * In line with the new SMS code is the fact that threading and pools
         just are not working together well.  This is due to the fact that
  @@ -178,6 +170,11 @@
         the system level (straight arithmetic from what I can tell).  If you 
         have access to the Solaris source code:
  +    * Add a way to query APR for what features it has at runtime (i.e. 
  +      threads).
  +      Justin says: I'm not completely sold on this, but it has been mentioned 
  +                   before and at least added to STATUS.
   Documentation that needs writing:

View raw message