apr-commits mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From r..@covalent.net
Subject Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS
Date Thu, 07 Dec 2000 14:41:37 GMT

>   +    * use libtool
>   +        Status: Greg +1 (volunteers)

As much as I hate libtool, I can agree to this, but I would ask that it
wait until Jim has a chance to voice his opinion, because I know he hates

>   +
>   +    * snarf rules.mk(.in) from APRUTIL to simplify makefiles
>   +        Status: Greg +1 (volunteers)

Slow down there cow-boy.  :-)  We had this discussion once on the list,
and although a few people liked the idea of moving stuff into a rules.mk,
many people, myself included, thought that having all the different
Makefiles just made the build system more complex not less.  Until we have
a consensus about this, I would ask that you leave the build system alone.


Ryan Bloom                        	rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131

View raw message