Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-bugs-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39618 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2009 16:38:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Jun 2009 16:38:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 9406 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2009 16:38:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-bugs-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 9373 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2009 16:38:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@apr.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list bugs@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 9365 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jun 2009 16:38:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:38:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2000.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.140] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (140.211.11.140) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:38:22 +0000 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 5EDF7234C044; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:38:01 -0700 (PDT) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: bugs@apr.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41254] apr_queue_t enhancements X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: newchanged X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: APR X-Bugzilla-Component: APR-util X-Bugzilla-Keywords: PatchAvailable X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: freeswitch@cartissolutions.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@apr.apache.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: In-Reply-To: References: Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20090629163802.5EDF7234C044@brutus.apache.org> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:38:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41254 --- Comment #12 from Yossi Neiman 2009-06-29 09:38:01 PST --- Correct, this was designed for a situation where the consumer thread is not the one initiating any reload of configuration. Also, it would need to be up to the application that is consuming off of the apr_queue_t to determine how to handle the potential for that specific race condition, and not the queue itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@apr.apache.org