apr-bugs mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42889] - Thread pooling declaration fix and enhancements
Date Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:34:11 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42889>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42889





------- Additional Comments From henryjen@ztune.net  2007-07-25 22:34 -------
I considered that, and I have no preference to either way.

The reason I left it out is because the thread will only stop after becoming
idle again, i.e., no other tasks in the queue. While this most likely mean all
other threads will be idle as well and unless the max_idle was changed, the
thread need to be stopped anyway.

Make sense?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@apr.apache.org


Mime
View raw message