Mailing-List: contact bugs-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: bugs@apr.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40764]  - apr_get_env calls with zero-length values
 should not return APR_ENOENT on Windows
In-Reply-To: <bug-40764-43213@http.issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Message-Id: <20061108143035.0B4887142F8@brutus.apache.org>
Date: Wed,  8 Nov 2006 06:30:35 -0800 (PST)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40764>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40764


------- Additional Comments From margol@beamartyr.net  2006-11-08 06:30 -------
I don't have many UNIX boxes to play with it on...  I frankly don't even have
many different flavors of linux that I use these days (Debian, Ubuntu and
Morphix - but that's all really just debian with different names). 

Regarding the test, I'm looking at the changes you made, and trying to figure
out the reasoning (mainly so I can "do it right the first time" next time); I
see you separated the check for get/set from the check for del. I don't
understand why that makes it more platform neutral than checking for all of them
together.  I saw it as one subtest to check everything.  We've already
ascertained that get and/or set work as they should in previous tests; what are
we accomplishing by separating the checks?

Thanks for the feedback!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.