Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0BA200BF8 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:17:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 988B0160B3F; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E39CF160B32 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:17:49 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 28402 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2017 09:17:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@apex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@apex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@apex.apache.org Received: (qmail 28392 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2017 09:17:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:17:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AA77AC0076 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:17:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1PwLAGzGgcVz for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp69.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp69.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.69]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 581AE5FC02 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:17:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 745A05BBD; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:17:23 -0500 (EST) X-Auth-ID: parmeshwari.dayal@orkash.com Received: by smtp1.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: parmeshwari.dayal-AT-orkash.com) with ESMTPSA id E04075B0B for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:17:22 -0500 (EST) X-Sender-Id: parmeshwari.dayal@orkash.com Received: from [192.168.0.105] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [122.160.142.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.7.12); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 04:17:23 -0500 Subject: Re: CEP using Apache Apex To: users@apex.apache.org References: From: parmesh Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:47:21 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:17:50 -0000 Hi, This is Parmesh and I am exploring Apex for some use-cases.In that use-case i also need this(CEP). Please enable this capability in this if possible. Regards Parmesh On Friday 13 January 2017 02:33 PM, Priyanka Gugale wrote: > Hi, > > I was looking into possibility of integrating rules engines with > Apache Apex. This will help to cater use cases like complex event > processing using Apache Apex. > > I gave a quick try to write a malhar operator which uses drools > library to do event processing and return appropriate result. I > haven't done any detailed usage analysis w.t.r. memory, complexity of > using rules which spread across events etc. But does community think > this is a good area and we should explore more on this? > > If yes I will try to put in basic operator in Malhar and work on details. > > -Priyanka