apex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vlad Rozov <v.ro...@datatorrent.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] impersonation and application path
Date Wed, 24 May 2017 16:01:57 GMT
My view is from a different angle. APPLICATION_PATH takes the priority 
and is used if specified. For me it's odd to use another settings to 
specify default, when the APPLICATION_PATH can be explicitly set.

Thank you,

Vlad


On 5/24/17 07:07, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
> The way I see it, based on your comments your vote is for option 2. a)
> which is default to impersonated user and caller uses APPLICATION_PATH to
> override the path to use impersonating user if needed. Not sure why we
> would need a separate vote. The new setting in option 1. b would default to
> impersonated user and in 2. b will default to impersonating user.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Vlad Rozov <v.rozov@datatorrent.com>
> wrote:
>
>> IMO, it should be different vote. In case APPLICATION_PATH is explicitly
>> specified, it should be used. If it is not specified, there are few options
>> to consider.
>> 1. My suggestion was always default to the impersonated user home
>> directory as a starting point for constructing APPLICATION_PATH
>> 2. Your suggestion is to have another settings that will allow to choose
>> between impersonated and impersonating users. Please propose what will be
>> the default for the new setting ( a) impersonating or b) impersonated).
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Vlad
>>
>>
>> On 5/23/17 22:00, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
>>
>>> I thought it was the mechanism you suggested to specify impersonating
>>> user's directory so I listed it here. If I am mistaken and your option is
>>> not covered, please include it and since it is early in the voting folks
>>> can include it in their voting preference. If not, please provide your
>>> choice.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:40 PM, Vlad Rozov <v.rozov@datatorrent.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't see how option a is applicable here. In case APPLICATION_PATH is
>>>> explicitly specified should not it be used independently of
>>>> impersonation?
>>>> It can point to any location, not necessarily to home directory of
>>>> impersonating or impersonated user.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Vlad
>>>>
>>>> On 5/23/17 10:34, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Based on the discussion on the dev list on this topic, captured here
>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6abb0f58427a70396f943f
>>>>> 99adc7534431016024f61703b248ce7bfb@%3Cdev.apex.apache.org%3E>,
>>>>> a few different approaches were discussed including the pros and cons.
I
>>>>> would like to put the suggested approaches up for a vote. Please go
>>>>> through
>>>>> the thread above if you are unfamiliar with the topic. Here are the
>>>>> options.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Let the default remain as the impersonating user
>>>>>           a. The user specifies to use impersonated user's directory
by
>>>>> setting the APPLICATION_PATH attribute.
>>>>>           b. The user specifies the use of impersonated user's resources
>>>>> using
>>>>> a new setting that will internally set the APPLICATION_PATH to the
>>>>> corresponding value and any other resources in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Change the default from current behavior to use the impersonated
>>>>> user's
>>>>> resources instead
>>>>>           a. and b. similar to 1. but specifying impersonating user's
>>>>> resources instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> My vote is for Option 1, Sub-option b).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>


Mime
View raw message