Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DC8200BD4 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 05:33:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id AF5FD160B10; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0274C160B0B for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 05:33:54 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 88209 invoked by uid 500); 2 Dec 2016 04:33:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@apex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apex.apache.org Received: (qmail 88197 invoked by uid 99); 2 Dec 2016 04:33:53 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 04:33:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0445B1AA282 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:33:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.979 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=datatorrent-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hJAHhHheDB9l for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f41.google.com (mail-vk0-f41.google.com [209.85.213.41]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 353B25F47D for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 04:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id x186so140220080vkd.1 for ; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:33:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=datatorrent-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=QI8VeGRKNHnX+SmXLrPQxqrFeH0MOoCpH0MrjQ6001Y=; b=YOQOA4m2lZyRLJWde7d3FfW/OyKWtksEaikacnP0bz+6WvxRwpStOnvbuiSmf7jyC3 cJ3ZXt1iAiaRSSW77yexx5YJ0MwRv3JerA6uIqgSlB4aJa5FSJK1BSaha0yPLmatrmM2 5BJ87978n4JrAkqAlOPy4Bkhtof2b7NvZnpUy6/y6KrfDIRu0lTe5TWA2QOsEahLcTSv 3El4H1i0x8nXODEfqpROS9Ft19bDTN86cJRvkiv7W0c8zF3SH0ytnn+jC30VmR+7Q1xc PN6X1w21mSNTo7OAzC8eLVn0qaCKnfdGncCX1WDZ/QphphJ+o+Kzptoy8cfhzYQEgnBc TnMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=QI8VeGRKNHnX+SmXLrPQxqrFeH0MOoCpH0MrjQ6001Y=; b=Px4xPYJeOrLtMypSXqMCe64nqIo1BpGRfzvPSwxqkW4LJ1/rFnNCib4Zm24BPEgqBs tpddtL71QRQp7UTuKVGA7AwSg88FLWae5ysbV8H1MWcwb/a6ht3TyedBukbAV8rI3zEk AF0XEgy6/JY7L7yxt5urNh4lrOiNv1KQ4JL0xVnBPbpIbzL+KbOZilH0ZJcpjlUSJk22 W+x2ab1B+sxmeJCYT5xG3zlMMG8QJneLCRScaqGv/HNAjTNdzyGezz6QtLTCoGUEFgED j8ziq9ZQr/CluV2RWa7ojU/5LGN7Ygn2c+WxM6Hxc2TQmfc9yr2nI6Gc8eYDQOtXTUQs wicQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02JJZPE8aAf8amjBpga9OPTk720jQsyT5aSOouU6psuS1gkXakWcxrTnLfkgB2QBcOZc3D7k0gnkS/soMs8 X-Received: by 10.31.167.77 with SMTP id q74mr15421095vke.135.1480653227877; Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:33:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.1.140 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:33:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1A2D6668-2536-442F-A170-D25B2A4EF836@datatorrent.com> <89ABC717-0859-456A-BB78-6482A8ED5297@datatorrent.com> <4497A992-36D5-4D6A-9FA8-9B2CD3A5B62F@datatorrent.com> From: Bhupesh Chawda Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:03:27 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: "ExcludeNodes" for an Apex application To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114278eeaefb740542a571f2 archived-at: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 04:33:55 -0000 --001a114278eeaefb740542a571f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Okay, I think that serves an alternate purpose of detecting any newly gone bad node and excluding it. +1 for covering the original scenario under anti-affinity. ~ Bhupesh On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Munagala Ramanath wrote: > It only takes effect after failures -- no way to exclude from the get-go. > > Ram > > On Dec 1, 2016 7:15 PM, "Bhupesh Chawda" wrote: > > > As suggested by Sandesh, the parameter > > MAX_CONSECUTIVE_CONTAINER_FAILURES_FOR_BLACKLIST seems to do exactly > what > > is needed. > > Why would this not work? > > > > ~ Bhupesh > > > --001a114278eeaefb740542a571f2--