apex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Yan <da...@datatorrent.com>
Subject Re: Malhar release 3.6
Date Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:05:35 GMT
Thomas,

We need more time for the timebucket change and the purging feature, and we
need to do benchmarking after those features have been implemented.
Is it possible to postpone the release? If not, we can shoot for completing
the features for the 3.7.0 release.

David

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Thomas Weise <thw@apache.org> wrote:

> David, Siyuan,
>
> Any update, I would like to cut the RC.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 10:23 PM, Siyuan Hua <siyuan@datatorrent.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes yes,
> > We need to put the clear plan upfront
> >
> > This ticket was thought and scheduled to be done after the
> APEXMALHAR-2271
> > SpillableSetMultimap which bucketize elements on the time from values.
> > But per discussion with David,  we realized this ticket is more important
> > and affect the general purging functionality so I just jumped to this
> issue
> > late last week.
> > Now the status is the pull request is there. I feel it can be merged
> soon.
> > https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/503
> >
> > Regards,
> > Siyuan
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Thomas Weise <thw@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > David,
> > >
> > > APEXMALHAR-2301 is still open. Are we on track to complete the JIRAs by
> > > Monday or should we move to next release?
> > >
> > > Siyuan,
> > >
> > > There is a question on the ticket from a month ago that wasn't
> > addressed. I
> > > think there needs to be more visibility on the thought process and
> > > decisions made, otherwise it is very difficult for others to follow.
> Open
> > > collaboration is key.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:29 PM, David Yan <david@datatorrent.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > We would like to finish the following tickets if possible for the
> 3.6.0
> > > > release:
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2301 (ETA: 11/18)
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2339 (ETA: 11/21)
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2345 (ETA: 11/21)
> > > >
> > > > For https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2271, since
> this
> > > only
> > > > affects Session Windows and still quite some work needs to be done
> > there,
> > > > we would like to defer that to the next release.
> > > >
> > > > Siyuan and Bright, please also chime in if I'm missing anything.
> > > >
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Thomas Weise <thw@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > David,
> > > > >
> > > > > Any update WRT APEXMALHAR-2130
> > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2130> /
> > > > APEXMALHAR-2301
> > > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2301> ?
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to cut first RC by end of the week.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Thomas Weise <thw@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > It has been a while and the issues that we were waiting for
are
> > still
> > > > > > unresolved.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%
> > > > > > 20%3D%203.6.0%20AND%20project%20%3D%20APEXMALHAR%20and%
> > > > > 20resolution%20%3D%
> > > > > > 20unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20ASC
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would suggest:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > APEXMALHAR-2300 <https://issues.apache.org/
> > > jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2300
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > > defer
> > > > > > APEXMALHAR-2130 <https://issues.apache.org/
> > > jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2130
> > > > >
> > > > > /
> > > > > > APEXMALHAR-2301 <https://issues.apache.org/
> > > jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2301
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > > David/Siyuan can you please give an update and recommendation.
> > > > > > APEXMALHAR-2284 <https://issues.apache.org/
> > > jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2284
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > > see discussion on the PR and JIRA. Also discussed it with Bhupesh
> > and
> > > > > > Chinmay today and we think that this join operator should
> probably
> > be
> > > > > > replaced with the new operator that is based on WindowOperator.
> > > > > > APEXMALHAR-2203 <https://issues.apache.org/
> > > jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2203
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > > defer
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please provide any feedback you may have within a day so that
we
> > can
> > > > > > unblock the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Thomas
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:36 AM, Chaitanya Chebolu <
> > > > > > chaitanya@datatorrent.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi Thomas,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>    I am working on APEXMALHAR-2284 and will open a PR in
couple
> of
> > > > days.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > >> Chaitanya
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Thomas Weise <thw@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Is anyone working on APEXMALHAR-2284 ?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Bhupesh Chawda <
> > > > > >> bhupesh@datatorrent.com>
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > +1
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > ~ Bhupesh
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Tushar Gosavi
<
> > > > > >> tushar@datatorrent.com>
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > > +1
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > - Tushar.
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Aniruddha
Thombare
> > > > > >> > > > <aniruddha@datatorrent.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > +1
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > A
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > _____________________________________
> > > > > >> > > > > Sent with difficulty, I mean handheld
;)
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > > On 28 Oct 2016 12:30 pm, "Siyuan Hua"
<
> > > siyuan@datatorrent.com
> > > > >
> > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > >> > > > >> +1
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> Thanks´╝ü
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> Sent from my iPhone
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > > >> > On Oct 26, 2016, at 13:11,
Thomas Weise <
> > thw@apache.org>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Hi,
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > I'm proposing another release
of Malhar in November.
> > > There
> > > > > are
> > > > > >> 49
> > > > > >> > > > issues
> > > > > >> > > > >> > marked for the release, including
important bug
> fixes,
> > > new
> > > > > >> > > > documentation,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > SQL support and the work for
windowed operator state
> > > > > >> management:
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%
> > > > > >> > > > >> 20%3D%203.6.0%20AND%20project%
> > 20%3D%20APEXMALHAR%20ORDER%
> > > > > >> > > > >> 20BY%20status%20ASC
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Currently there is at least
one blocker, the join
> > > operator
> > > > is
> > > > > >> > broken
> > > > > >> > > > >> after
> > > > > >> > > > >> > change in managed state. It
also affects the SQL
> > feature.
> > > > > >> > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> > > > >> > Thomas
> > > > > >> > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message