Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F3B200B5E for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:52:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 62A44160AA4; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id A8774160A8F for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 22:52:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 34401 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2016 20:52:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apex.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@apex.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apex.apache.org Received: (qmail 34384 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2016 20:52:36 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:52:36 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3484BC0455 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:52:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.199 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.199 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zlFPO7db29Ps for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 149C55F256 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id m101so53194431ioi.2 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FDAPT4nSRNcnZ24s+EVsRRq/BrrRoSkqOvzl4d/LQwo=; b=zFYLHd10CNCIGezXywdPsnOrYnFy+Cvb87Qh5SgzldTEKZS6lD6PHvo+mFNnW+gZ+A kXrSI/zHC40lb4hFY9pluDO7VpDHDTQDyMJcnw90rrRu2h/mB8v7B8+r0MFk4Vm7jntZ JOpLb+54cNn0uQDWYDtwwSRxcZzS76fT5Tirpp9Ae5fgqHsJqnxbqhw4FZqoqZ6WkcY8 cnOfvEiYtjw7PEVEO3APi30d5iZytMsntI+19I6glVItzVCwJbn/bRD2y9bEofpHGO5W HE2PC5fbwIHLtIDfzyqqHtUAab/ZCI88Jt0F6Pje1jlVdkB7+B9gfD0CZ/fiKJZzFMXn hHYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=FDAPT4nSRNcnZ24s+EVsRRq/BrrRoSkqOvzl4d/LQwo=; b=jkC5shvrjXsmkMULT7D7vO6zaiRBk4yUuvltmG9atL3oWt0A0DSxygM1Dambmmeq0N 1fMgTGyO0FAuQxv+qTUFiJEZ7KiQNr1LWuVC1gdV+ye2Pakou23bjktkzYC7Bsyb1HW4 ARJJpJaJyZmWbr/ORJB8lee3ciGPtZmEawPzo0p6IG4L6S74Xu2lea3sx6frZEdg8Zke WuE3khgutA3bBLnjN4epOqTcjE1tVQJaagvkKM2PPcQWhp9F6dBLgVuoQO/nWPxx32pt reIUFJpe+SJtNEkmL/1CzGNHEDs73Fc0RA+IFIkMX7S1DKtZ4nV9q7awREVwbg3JFEZI fiuA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutqgj1cyotSepK7NAxwLkpW7KxzTiJsblhEJ4HvGvlQHAsx4LALrdJiJ18tNQkHOVkt9VI5k5Zn1ZDFew== X-Received: by 10.107.148.74 with SMTP id w71mr8435987iod.47.1470862352710; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.0.210 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:52:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8EB85CDD-C8C2-4702-B93B-89440247FE48@datatorrent.com> From: Ashwin Chandra Putta Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:52:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: anti-affinity - parameter to control the containers of an operator on a node To: dev@apex.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fee740bfff10539bdd4f2 archived-at: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 20:52:38 -0000 --001a113fee740bfff10539bdd4f2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I don't think we have such a feature, it will be a good addition. A configuration parameter for number of operators in a container would be useful as well. Regards, Ashwin. On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Amol Kekre wrote: > Good idea. > > Thks > Amol > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Venkatesh Kottapalli < > venkatesh@datatorrent.com> wrote: > > > Hi team, > > > > On the anti-affinity rules while deploying containers, do we have a > > feature which can control the number of containers of the same operator > > that get deployed on the same node. If the environment is capable of > > handling, then this will be a good feature to have as it is possible that > > certain operators could be resource hungry and this would distribute the > > load uniformly on all the nodes. > > > > Please share your thoughts on this. > > > > -Venkatesh. > -- Regards, Ashwin. --001a113fee740bfff10539bdd4f2--