Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apex.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@apex.apache.org
From: vrozov <git@git.apache.org>
To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org
Reply-To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org
References: <git-pr-364-apex-core@git.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <git-pr-364-apex-core@git.apache.org>
Subject: [GitHub] apex-core pull request #364: APEXCORE-448 Made operator name available in op...
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <20160801224550.527C3E058E@git1-us-west.apache.org>
Date: Mon,  1 Aug 2016 22:45:50 +0000 (UTC)
archived-at: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 22:45:55 -0000

Github user vrozov commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/apex-core/pull/364#discussion_r73066772
  
    --- Diff: api/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/api/Context.java ---
    @@ -328,6 +328,8 @@
          */
         int getWindowsFromCheckpoint();
     
    +    String getOperatorName();
    --- End diff --
    
    The same comment applies to other introduced `operatorName` fields where `id` means operator Id, while `operatorName` is used for an operator name.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---