apex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Weise <tho...@datatorrent.com>
Subject Re: auto-generated emails
Date Fri, 12 Aug 2016 18:21:00 GMT
https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/agent/INFRA/issue/INFRA-12419


On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Sanjay Pujare <sanjay@datatorrent.com>
wrote:

> I recommend leaving JIRA untouched and only turn off PR comments to the
> dev@ mailing list.
>
> On 8/11/16, 6:16 PM, "Thomas Weise" <thomas@datatorrent.com> wrote:
>
>     I'm going to create a ticket to turn off pull request comments to the
> dev@
>     mailing list.
>
>     In addition to that, we have also PR comments attached to JIRA:
>
>     https://reference.apache.org/pmc/github
>
>     The JIRA comments are also sent to the mailing list. So we could either
>     turn off attaching PR comments to JIRA or turn off all JIRA comments
> to the
>     mailing list. It may be useful though to have JIRA comments other then
> PR
>     comments on the mailing list?
>
>
>
>     On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
> chinmay@datatorrent.com>
>     wrote:
>
>     > Sure Pramod. I'll take a look at it.
>     >
>     > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Pramod Immaneni <
> pramod@datatorrent.com>
>     > wrote:
>     >
>     > > Chinmay,
>     > >
>     > > Do you want to investigate setting these up.
>     > >
>     > > Thanks
>     > >
>     > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 9:15 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
>     > > chinmay@datatorrent.com>
>     > > wrote:
>     > >
>     > > > Pramod,
>     > > >
>     > > > My Suggestion is on the same lines as what Yogi suggested, except
>     > instead
>     > > > of creating a seperate mailing list, send further mails to folks
> in the
>     > > > comments.
>     > > >
>     > > > -Chinmay.
>     > > >
>     > > >
>     > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Pramod Immaneni <
>     > pramod@datatorrent.com
>     > > >
>     > > > wrote:
>     > > >
>     > > > > Chinmay are you suggesting the first mail only sent to folks
>     > mentioned
>     > > > and
>     > > > > not everyone in the list? I like Yogi's suggestion on having
a
>     > separate
>     > > > > commits list where all commit emails go but initial emails are
> still
>     > > sent
>     > > > > to dev and dev can mostly focus on discussions.
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Anyone, wants to volunteer to investigate these options?
>     > > > >
>     > > > > Thanks
>     > > > >
>     > > > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Yogi Devendra <
>     > > > > devendra.vyavahare@gmail.com
>     > > > > > wrote:
>     > > > >
>     > > > > > +1 on reducing automated emails for comments on dev list.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > How about having separate mailing list such as commits@apex
> which
>     > > > would
>     > > > > > have full archive of comments?
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > New JIRA, PR can be sent to both dev, commits.
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > ~ Yogi
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > On 13 July 2016 at 10:22, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
>     > chinmay@datatorrent.com
>     > > >
>     > > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > >
>     > > > > > > Strongly +1 for this.
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > For 1, can the mail be sent to someone who is mentioned
in
> the
>     > PR?
>     > > So
>     > > > > for
>     > > > > > > e.g., if I mention @PramodSSImmaneni , then Pramod
will be
> part
>     > of
>     > > PR
>     > > > > > email
>     > > > > > > notification all further back and forth communication
for
> that
>     > PR.
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > @Pramod, just using your name as an example.. :)
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > - Chinmay.
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Munagala Ramanath
<
>     > > > > ram@datatorrent.com>
>     > > > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > +1
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > Ram
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Pramod Immaneni
<
>     > > > > > pramod@datatorrent.com
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > wrote:
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > Hi,
>     > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > I was wondering how everyone felt about the
volume of
>     > > > > auto-generated
>     > > > > > > > emails
>     > > > > > > > > on this list. Looks like multiple emails
are generated
> and
>     > sent
>     > > > to
>     > > > > > > > everyone
>     > > > > > > > > on the list even for relatively smaller actions
such as
>     > > > commenting
>     > > > > > on a
>     > > > > > > > > pull request, one from git, another from
JIRA etc.
>     > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > Understanding that there is a need for openness,
how
> about
>     > > > finding
>     > > > > a
>     > > > > > > > > balance. Here are some ideas. I do not know
if all of
> these
>     > are
>     > > > > > > > technically
>     > > > > > > > > feasible.
>     > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > 1. An email is sent to all in the list when
a new pull
>     > request
>     > > is
>     > > > > > > created
>     > > > > > > > > or merged but email notifications for back
and forth
> comments
>     > > > > during
>     > > > > > > the
>     > > > > > > > > review are only sent to participants in that
> particular pull
>     > > > > request.
>     > > > > > > > > 2. Similar process as above with JIRA. If
someone is
>     > interested
>     > > > in
>     > > > > > all
>     > > > > > > > the
>     > > > > > > > > updates to JIRA, including those that come
from the
> pull
>     > > request,
>     > > > > > they
>     > > > > > > > can
>     > > > > > > > > add themselves to the watch list for that
particular
> JIRA.
>     > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > > > Thanks
>     > > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > > >
>     > > > > > >
>     > > > > >
>     > > > >
>     > > >
>     > >
>     >
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message