apex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Munagala Ramanath <...@datatorrent.com>
Subject Re: empty operator/stream/module names
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2016 17:36:04 GMT
It will not be possible to configure such operators from an XML file other
than through
wildcards -- but maybe that's OK.

Ram

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Sanjay Pujare <sanjay@datatorrent.com>
wrote:

> I differ. For the UI to render a DAG the names are useful, but if the name
> is not required by the engine i.e. the engine is able to execute your
> application fine with empty or null strings as names, is there any reason
> to make them mandatory?
>
> On the other hand, we can come up with a scheme for system generated names
> when the caller doesn’t provide a name. I have some ideas.
>
>
> On 8/4/16, 9:48 AM, "Munagala Ramanath" <ram@datatorrent.com> wrote:
>
>     I don't see any reason to allow either.
>
>     Ram
>
>     On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Vlad Rozov <v.rozov@datatorrent.com>
> wrote:
>
>     > Currently addOperator/addStream/addModule allows both null and empty
>     > string in the operator/stream/module names. Is there any reason to
> allow
>     > empty string? Should empty string and null be disallowed in those
> APIs?
>     >
>     > Vlad
>     >
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message