apex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Chinmay Kolhatkar (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (APEXCORE-461) Hidden ports in extended operators appear in the application package
Date Thu, 19 May 2016 03:41:12 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15290419#comment-15290419
] 

Chinmay Kolhatkar commented on APEXCORE-461:
--------------------------------------------

[~bhupesh] What should be the condition which tells what ports from subclasses should be hidden?
I see this Jira to be a valid point. But the condition for this seems to be on a case by case
basis.

> Hidden ports in extended operators appear in the application package
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: APEXCORE-461
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-461
>             Project: Apache Apex Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Bhupesh Chawda
>
> Ports which are hidden due to overriding in the sub classes of the operator should not
be shown in the final app package.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message