Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apex.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org
From: tweise <git@git.apache.org>
To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org
Reply-To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org
References: <git-pr-250-incubator-apex-core@git.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <git-pr-250-incubator-apex-core@git.apache.org>
Subject: [GitHub] incubator-apex-core pull request: APEXCORE-10 #resolve
 Changes for...
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <20160407190254.6A2E0DFDEC@git1-us-west.apache.org>
Date: Thu,  7 Apr 2016 19:02:54 +0000 (UTC)

Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/250#discussion_r58926771
  
    --- Diff: engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/plan/physical/PhysicalPlan.java ---
    @@ -357,25 +417,51 @@ public PhysicalPlan(LogicalPlan dag, PlanContext ctx) {
               if (!container.operators.isEmpty()) {
                 LOG.warn("Operator {} shares container without locality contraint due to insufficient resources.", oper);
               }
    +          // TODO: Check if PT Operators conflict in anti-affinity, Pick the first container that does not conflict
    --- End diff --
    
    Why would this happen here and not during logical plan validation?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---