Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E37F19E3C for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11376 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2016 04:35:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apex-dev-archive@apex.apache.org Received: (qmail 11310 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2016 04:35:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apex.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apex.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11299 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2016 04:35:04 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:35:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3CC0AC0319 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:35:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.021 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.021 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lo7Bg5EBNeRQ for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 423F15F1F3 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11290 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2016 04:35:00 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:35:00 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 62678DFBA0; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:35:00 +0000 (UTC) From: ilooner To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org Reply-To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] incubator-apex-malhar pull request: APEXMALHAR-1897 added managed ... Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20160321043500.62678DFBA0@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 04:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Github user ilooner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/145#discussion_r56781864 --- Diff: library/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/lib/state/managed/ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,243 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ +package com.datatorrent.lib.state.managed; + +import java.io.DataInputStream; +import java.io.DataOutputStream; +import java.io.IOException; +import java.util.concurrent.Future; +import java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue; + +import org.slf4j.Logger; +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; + +import org.apache.hadoop.fs.LocatedFileStatus; +import org.apache.hadoop.fs.RemoteIterator; + +import com.google.common.base.Preconditions; +import com.google.common.collect.Queues; +import com.google.common.util.concurrent.Futures; + +import com.datatorrent.lib.fileaccess.FileAccess; +import com.datatorrent.lib.state.BucketedState; +import com.datatorrent.netlet.util.Slice; + +/** + * In this implementation of {@link ManagedState} the buckets in memory are time-buckets. + *

+ * + * Difference from {@link ManagedTimeStateImpl}:
+ *

    + *
  1. The main buckets in {@link ManagedTimeStateImpl} are unique adhoc long ids which the user provides with the + * key. In this implementation the main buckets are time buckets. The user provides just the time and the time bucket is + * derived from it. + *
  2. + *
    + * + *
  3. In regards to the bucket data on disk, in {@link ManagedTimeStateImpl} the buckets are persisted on disk + * with each bucket data further grouped into time-buckets: {base_path}/{bucketId}/{time-bucket id}.
    + * In this implementation operator id is used as bucketId (on disk) and there is just one time-bucket under a + * particular operator id: + * {base_path}/{operator id}/{time bucket id}. + *
  4. + *
    + * + *
  5. In {@link ManagedTimeStateImpl} a bucket belongs to just one partition. Multiple partitions cannot write to + * the same bucket.
    + * In this implementation multiple partitions can be working with the same time-bucket (since time-bucket is derived + * from time). This works because on the disk the time-bucket data is segregated under each operator id. + *
  6. + *
    + * + *
  7. While {@link ManagedTimeStateImpl} can support dynamic partitioning by pre-allocating buckets this will not + * be able to support dynamic partitioning efficiently. + *
  8. + + *
+ */ +public class ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl extends AbstractManagedStateImpl implements BucketedState +{ + private final transient LinkedBlockingQueue purgedTimeBuckets = Queues.newLinkedBlockingQueue(); + + public ManagedTimeUnifiedStateImpl() + { + bucketsFileSystem = new TimeUnifiedBucketsFileSystem(); + } + + @Override + public int getNumBuckets() + { + return timeBucketAssigner.getNumBuckets(); + } + + @Override + public void put(long time, Slice key, Slice value) + { + long timeBucket = timeBucketAssigner.getTimeBucketFor(time); + if (timeBucket == -1) { + //time is expired so return null. + return; + } + int bucketIdx = prepareBucket(timeBucket); + + buckets[bucketIdx].put(key, timeBucket, value); + + } + + @SuppressWarnings("SynchronizationOnLocalVariableOrMethodParameter") + @Override + public Slice getSync(long time, Slice key) + { + long timeBucket = timeBucketAssigner.getTimeBucketFor(time); + if (timeBucket == -1) { + //time is expired so return expired slice. + return BucketedState.EXPIRED; + } + int bucketIdx = prepareBucket(timeBucket); + Bucket bucket = buckets[bucketIdx]; + + synchronized (bucket) { + return bucket.get(key, timeBucket, Bucket.ReadSource.ALL); + } + } + + @SuppressWarnings("SynchronizationOnLocalVariableOrMethodParameter") + @Override + public Future getAsync(long time, Slice key) + { + long timeBucket = timeBucketAssigner.getTimeBucketFor(time); + if (timeBucket == -1) { + //time is expired so return null. + return Futures.immediateFuture(BucketedState.EXPIRED); + } + int bucketIdx = prepareBucket(timeBucket); + Bucket bucket = buckets[bucketIdx]; + synchronized (bucket) { + Slice cachedVal = buckets[bucketIdx].get(key, timeBucket, Bucket.ReadSource.MEMORY); + if (cachedVal != null) { + return Futures.immediateFuture(cachedVal); + } + return readerService.submit(new KeyFetchTask(bucket, key, timeBucket, throwable)); + } + } + + @Override + public void endWindow() + { + super.endWindow(); + Long purgedTimeBucket; + + //tear down all the purged time buckets + while (null != (purgedTimeBucket = purgedTimeBuckets.poll())) { + int purgedTimeBucketIdx = getBucketIdx(purgedTimeBucket); + if (buckets[purgedTimeBucketIdx] != null && buckets[purgedTimeBucketIdx].getBucketId() == purgedTimeBucket) { + buckets[purgedTimeBucketIdx].teardown(); + buckets[purgedTimeBucketIdx] = null; + } + } + } + + @Override + protected void handleBucketConflict(int bucketIdx, long newBucketId) + { + Preconditions.checkArgument(buckets[bucketIdx].getBucketId() < newBucketId, "new time bucket should have a value" + + " greater than the old time bucket"); + //Time buckets are purged periodically so here a bucket conflict is expected and so we just ignore conflicts. + buckets[bucketIdx].teardown(); + buckets[bucketIdx] = newBucket(newBucketId); + buckets[bucketIdx].setup(this); + } + + @Override + public void purgeTimeBucketsLessThanEqualTo(long timeBucket) + { + purgedTimeBuckets.add(timeBucket); + super.purgeTimeBucketsLessThanEqualTo(timeBucket); + } + + /** + * This uses operator id instead of bucket id as the name of parent folder of time-buckets. This is because + * multiple partitions may work on same time-buckets. + */ + public static class TimeUnifiedBucketsFileSystem extends BucketsFileSystem + { --- End diff -- Missing Override annotations on methods for this class. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---