Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apex-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2804E18CAB for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 28105 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2016 21:41:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apex-dev-archive@apex.apache.org Received: (qmail 28041 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2016 21:41:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apex.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apex.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 27870 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2016 21:41:42 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:41:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7089F1804F0 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:41:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.227 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.227 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.554, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p6Wdxw2b6q1T for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with SMTP id A453643F5E for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:41:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24861 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2016 21:41:40 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:41:40 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9D32C1F78 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:41:40 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (APEXCORE-201) Reported latency is wrong when a downstream operator is behind more than 1000 windows MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15113147#comment-15113147 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-201: ----------------------------------------- Github user gauravgopi123 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/194#discussion_r50594505 --- Diff: engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/StreamingContainerManager.java --- @@ -1357,12 +1265,14 @@ private void processOperatorDeployStatus(final PTOperator oper, OperatorHeartbea deactivatedOpers.add(oper); } sca.undeployOpers.add(oper.getId()); + slowestUpstreamOp.remove(oper); --- End diff -- Can we have test for this? > Reported latency is wrong when a downstream operator is behind more than 1000 windows > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: APEXCORE-201 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-201 > Project: Apache Apex Core > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: David Yan > Assignee: David Yan > > We should probably estimate this by reporting the latency using the number of windows behind when that happens. Right now it reports a stale latency. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)