apex-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (APEXCORE-201) Reported latency is wrong when a downstream operator is behind more than 1000 windows
Date Fri, 22 Jan 2016 21:41:40 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15113147#comment-15113147
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-201:
-----------------------------------------

Github user gauravgopi123 commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/194#discussion_r50594505
  
    --- Diff: engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/StreamingContainerManager.java ---
    @@ -1357,12 +1265,14 @@ private void processOperatorDeployStatus(final PTOperator oper,
OperatorHeartbea
                     deactivatedOpers.add(oper);
                   }
                   sca.undeployOpers.add(oper.getId());
    +              slowestUpstreamOp.remove(oper);
    --- End diff --
    
    Can we have test for this?


> Reported latency is wrong when a downstream operator is behind more than 1000 windows
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: APEXCORE-201
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-201
>             Project: Apache Apex Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: David Yan
>            Assignee: David Yan
>
> We should probably estimate this by reporting the latency using the number of windows
behind when that happens.  Right now it reports a stale latency.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message