Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-any23-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-any23-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 800C711808 for ; Sat, 17 May 2014 02:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20493 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2014 01:12:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-any23-dev-archive@any23.apache.org Received: (qmail 17056 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2014 01:11:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@any23.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@any23.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@any23.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for dev@any23.apache.org Received: (qmail 10362 invoked by uid 99); 16 May 2014 23:42:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=bqavjDqBlPkB8UCfZS096zV3xpo93kL+ZNjVEx9qrBo=; b=X1QPwMr9xi6NvZnx+NNbpxtUUnWjhJzWiR36YGxR6GGicl5Sn7MblGKfY9JYokGmhf aYJH+nvh3lr/8cyIgGeSfgfoRP+fRG5d48o4FjsexLBIoHGXNx8D9KZZ87svt/E7SQ+y ZZpZN2eVm8cMZmy72E7v/uMHKofzuYgIqMriyO7oanwC/FZ/4uDHawcNwKS9vCGnF6LJ G6xschRkmMvSrpxQjllJpBmPOhBlLYoHyhC18GflIs032wR6iFIrmqDKh4RSDbZxVQtI km5AgQdvfRjE6fV9SqLB7oNBeMEyAQgRnTSjdbcDF8vTKAqH9yx2DOO6BMl1n7fuWh4O odqg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwPXdIimhCh8S1crfUAEXwj5xMglQtBWokUtwbeT6Ma1Ug6uFRGkImH5oSkZeMmMvg/tZ+ X-Received: by 10.66.162.74 with SMTP id xy10mr25062235pab.4.1400283711938; Fri, 16 May 2014 16:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_883A05E5-5314-4FAB-AC2D-EE471716D31A" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Any23 1.0 Release From: Gregg Kellogg In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 16:41:49 -0700 Cc: user@any23.apache.org, "dev@any23.apache.org" , Public RDFa , "semantic-web@w3.org Web" Message-Id: References: <0A7FDB20-E2E6-407E-B681-D7C47A227F0B@greggkellogg.net> To: Lewis John Mcgibbney X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail=_883A05E5-5314-4FAB-AC2D-EE471716D31A Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On May 16, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney = wrote: > Hi Greg, >=20 > Thanks for your email. > Please see my replies inline. >=20 > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Gregg Kellogg = wrote: > Do you ever expect to fully support RDFa 1.1? >=20 > Yeah we do. Eventually someone will get around to it. If this is an = itch you have, we would very much encourage you to itch it and push it = back into the Any23 codebase ;) Not really a Java guy, so I don't think I can help here. > Look like it's just RDFa 1.0 with prefix support, even that fails many = tests. >=20 > Based on which version of Any23? Have you tried this new release or = are you just stating this based on your previous experience/assumptions? As I referenced, I used the http://any23.org/turtle endpoint. Perhaps = you haven't updated that yet, the version at the bottom of the = http://any23.org page says 0.9.1-SNAPSHOT from 2014-04-13, so it's = reasonably recent. > Please refer to thhe following ticket for a new RDFa parser proposal = which can be considered as the flagship issue of the 1.0 release. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ANY23-137=20 Looks like there are several comments in there relating to this already. = If the snapshot version doesn't include this, then that would explain = it. > I think in the past, we've suggested using alternative Java RDFa = implementations; both Semargl [1] and clj-rdfa [2] are quite performant = (substantially faster than the any23 endpoint [3]) and fully conforms to = the spec. >=20 > The end point you refer to has recently been overhauled and will be = updated with nightly SNAPSHOT's of stable Any23 code from now on. I've = just jumped on to leading this initiative so please bare with us until = our scripts pull the next build some time tonight. Excellent; once it's updated, you can either try pointing the RDFa test = harness yourself, or feel free to contact me for support. >=20 > Running the basic test suite[4] shows you passing only 58 out of 170 = tests. >=20 > Again, based on what version of Any23? > We are currently at 1.0. I would however really like to work with = whoever runs this service to improve the stats as much as possible... = once I know what the stats are actually quantifying and representing. The rdfa.info service is run by the RDFa community; the test suite there = is used to determine conformance of processors claiming to support RDFa = 1.0 or 1.1, which is where the EARL reports used to generate the overall = conformance report come from. The any23 endpoint is configured in for = informational purposes, along with that of most conforming processors. = The overall implementation report for RDFa 1.1 can be found here: = http://rdfa.info/earl-reports/ You can either run the service by cloning the rdfa.info website = and running it using the = run-suite script, or most easily, simply enter the endpoint of your RDFa = processor (such as http://any23.org/turtle) and it will be run = automatically from the web page. This gives detailed conformance reports = for each test across all host languages and RDFa variations. I'd be = happy to work with you on this. Let me know if I can help further; it would be great if any23 becomes = 100% conformant for RDFa. Gregg P.S., there are also some Microdata to RDF tests at = if you're interested. > Thanks > Lewis --Apple-Mail=_883A05E5-5314-4FAB-AC2D-EE471716D31A--