Mailing-List: contact dev-help@any23.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@any23.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tommaso.teofili@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.192.171 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGaRif19OyiJ3xaWiDwxyt1XmevNWoPWE6yN_pK0ZEZd0itx9w@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAGaRif19OyiJ3xaWiDwxyt1XmevNWoPWE6yN_pK0ZEZd0itx9w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teofili@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:17:21 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAGnSx04GzsAJ5e8iX8V-otFM7t4scJFGiJJU9_Sxu5Y=PBRCMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Any23 Project Direction
To: dev@any23.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacbe9e42bf8204e9791c81

--047d7bacbe9e42bf8204e9791c81
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

2013/10/24 Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>

> Hi All,
>
> @Chris, thanks for the input
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:34 AM, <dev-digest-help@any23.apache.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks Lewis, I replied favorably over on the Tika list. We'll see
> > what others think.
> >
> >
> >
> OK so the thread has been slow cooking over on dev@tika for a while now
> and
> for those who missed it, it can be seen here. [0]
>
> From those that replied over there it seems that there is a degree of
> support for merging Any23 in to Apache Tika.
> IMHO this would be much more favorable than taking it straight to the attic
> (even given the work it will take to do the branching and merging). I think
> that it's worth a go.
>
> What I think would be great though, would be for us to release what we have
> so far as 0.9.0. This would allow us to release the server artifacts as
> well with the improvements made to the code within the 0.8.0 release.
>
> @Peter, I wonder if there is any progress on the issue AMY23-137: RDFa
> parser implementation proposal? If we can, then getting this in to the
> codebase would be great. If not then we can release and bump this onwards.
>
> In summary:
>
> 1) Does anyone have objections to making a release? I am happy to go
> release manager.
>

no objections from my side, +1 for a release.


> 2) Does anyone have objections to us progressing with the initiative to
> take what we can from Any23 in to Apache Tika?
>

same here, no objections, +1 for going Apache Tika.

Thanks all and sorry for my absence so far.
Regards,
Tommaso


>
> Thanks
>
> Lewis
>
> [0] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tika.apache.org/msg06707.html
>

--047d7bacbe9e42bf8204e9791c81--