ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Resource collections - Linux vs. windows
Date Tue, 11 Feb 2014 14:15:12 GMT
Can you expand your example into a self-contained example that builds up an
appropriate structure first, then still fails on Linux?

Matt


On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Kimpton, C (Chris) <
Chris.Kimpton@rabobank.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a target that is trying to delete some directories, all but the
> last few.  It works as expected (I believe - it deletes files when
> expected) on my dev box (windows), but is not deleting anything on the
> build server (Linux):
>
> It builds up 2 resource collections - one for all directories and one for
> the last few and then does a delete based on the difference.
>
>         <resources id="resource-all-dirs">
>             <dirset dir="${release-base-dir}" >
>                 <filename regex="^\d+$" />
>             </dirset>
>         </resources>
>
>         <resources id="resource-last-3-dirs">
>             <last count="4">
>                 <sort>
>                     <dirset dir="${release-base-dir}" >
>                         <filename regex="^\d+$" />
>                     </dirset>
>                     <date />
>                 </sort>
>             </last>
>         </resources>
>
>         <delete verbose="true">
>             <difference>
>                 <resources refid="resource-all-dirs"/>
>                 <resources refid="resource-last-3-dirs" />
>             </difference>
>         </delete>
>
> I have tried running with debug and/or verbose but that does not seem to
> add anything.  Using version 1.9.3.
>
> Any tips on how to track down the issue?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> _____________________________________________________________
>
> This email (including any attachments to it) is confidential, legally
> privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of
> the intended recipient only. If you have received this email in error,
> please advise us immediately and delete it. You are notified that
> disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the
> contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Although we have taken
> reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, we
> cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the
> viruses in this email or attachments. We exclude any liability for the
> content of this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the
> basis of the information provided in this email or its attachments, unless
> that information is subsequently confirmed in writing.
> _____________________________________________________________
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message