From user-return-71859-apmail-ant-user-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Mon Aug 8 16:13:52 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 362C587F0 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50453 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2011 16:13:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 50264 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2011 16:13:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 50256 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2011 16:13:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:13:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sfloess@nc.rr.com designates 75.180.132.123 as permitted sender) Received: from [75.180.132.123] (HELO cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com) (75.180.132.123) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:13:44 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=8mDY8c80ZOa76EOwICuS+E2YRQjxDgO9xqUnRMONc7w= c=1 sm=0 a=8MN4lfJQaL4A:10 a=3AxeTJZEnLkA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Zn+JcNUfWX/buaDEYgmvyA==:17 a=t7CeM3EgAAAA:8 a=FP58Ms26AAAA:8 a=NEAV23lmAAAA:8 a=AROk-wDjXf3vKB7RbCkA:9 a=stzv4K4LdWbS50q2I6cA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=QpLD477r4uoA:10 a=2e6ZYRoF4I4A:10 a=g4SCbRRqxGpVi3IH:21 a=9IsKPyq5CfYNaJ6t:21 a=Zn+JcNUfWX/buaDEYgmvyA==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 76.182.110.160 Received: from [76.182.110.160] ([76.182.110.160:48894] helo=flossware.homelinux.org) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 3A/F0-00666-22B004E4; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:13:22 +0000 Received: from centos-workstation.flossware.com (centos-workstation.flossware.com [192.168.168.200]) by flossware.homelinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACA18A808E for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 12:13:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 12:13:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Scot P. Floess" X-X-Sender: sfloess@centos-workstation.flossware.com To: Ant Users List Subject: Re: Are multiple targets run in order, or in parallel? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LRH 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It should unless there is a failure... Of course, you could test it yourself :) On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Echlin, Robert wrote: > Hi > If I run > "ant target1 target2 target3" > Will target1 be guaranteed to be complete before target2 is run? > The docs don't say. > > Thanks, > Rob > > -- > Rob Echlin, Documentation Systems Architect, Wind River > direct: +1.613.270.5796 | Skype video: rob.echlin.wr | robert.echlin@windriver.com > > Scot P. Floess RHCT (Certificate Number 605010084735240) Chief Architect FlossWare http://sourceforge.net/projects/flossware http://flossware.sourceforge.net https://github.com/organizations/FlossWare --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org