Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDF8E6B12 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29780 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 15:42:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 29693 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2011 15:42:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 29685 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2011 15:42:47 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:42:47 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Steve.Amerige@sas.com designates 65.55.88.14 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.55.88.14] (HELO TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com) (65.55.88.14) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 15:42:38 +0000 Received: from mail198-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.241) by TX2EHSOBE007.bigfish.com (10.9.40.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:42:17 +0000 Received: from mail198-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail198-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24E42D04A9 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:42:16 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -26 X-BigFish: S-26(zzbb2dK9371M542M1432N98dK4015Lzz1202hzzz2fh2a8h668h839h93fh61h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:149.173.6.149;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPVD:NLI;H:mercav05r.na.sas.com;RD:mercav05r.na.sas.com;EFVD:NLI Received-SPF: pass (mail198-tx2: domain of sas.com designates 149.173.6.149 as permitted sender) client-ip=149.173.6.149; envelope-from=Steve.Amerige@sas.com; helo=mercav05r.na.sas.com ;r.na.sas.com ; Received: from mail198-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail198-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1310139736722286_16615; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS022.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.247]) by mail198-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA711BF004E for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mercav05r.na.sas.com (149.173.6.149) by TX2EHSMHS022.bigfish.com (10.9.99.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.22; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 15:42:14 +0000 X-TM-IMSS-Message-ID: <6b99740c00010482@mercav05r.na.sas.com> Received: from [10.25.11.12] ([10.25.11.12]) by mercav05r.na.sas.com ([10.16.10.186]) with ESMTP (TREND IMSS SMTP Service 7.1) id 6b99740c00010482 ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:42:12 -0400 Message-ID: <4E172554.3060504@sas.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 11:42:12 -0400 From: Steve Amerige User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11 ThunderBrowse/3.3.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Equivalent: antcall with inheritrefs vs. runtarget References: <4E17204F.6090900@sas.com> <330B5A2BAB417E47A0BBB442C7BCB99D02B4CF1C@HQ-MAIL8.ptcnet.ptc.com> In-Reply-To: <330B5A2BAB417E47A0BBB442C7BCB99D02B4CF1C@HQ-MAIL8.ptcnet.ptc.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginatorOrg: sas.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks, Nathan. So, aside from performance and implementation issues, are they equivalent? That is, is there anything observable in a script as a practical matter between these two idioms? If not, I'd think I'd usually want runtarget instead of antcall with inheritrefs=true. On 7/8/2011 11:27 AM, Perrier, Nathan wrote: > No, because antcall creates a new project underneath the hood, whereas runtarget (antcontrib task) does not. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Amerige [mailto:Steve.Amerige@sas.com] > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 10:21 AM > To: Ant Users List > Subject: Equivalent: > Are the two statements below equivalent? > > > > > Enjoy, > Steve Amerige > SAS Institute, Deployment Software Developer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org