Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 15446 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2011 15:42:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Feb 2011 15:42:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 63177 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 15:42:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 62877 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2011 15:41:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Users List" Reply-To: "Ant Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 62869 invoked by uid 99); 1 Feb 2011 15:41:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:41:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of stephen.alan.connolly@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.173] (HELO mail-iy0-f173.google.com) (209.85.210.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:41:50 +0000 Received: by iye19 with SMTP id 19so6333836iye.4 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:41:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kug0YM17cWIXj5+h5xw7E/YhoqGN02UQB/jnQHtDVgQ=; b=VwJdibCuKP+hnF15c+7Sk0+qWLp3lAqgCeaKfCrC5+hWUVvw9pbwjQjaah6pewI744 zop3Kn/iv7na10Ny8RfypeRaPQYkYcIhmzyzGv5diqW7gP02aArQYTumlr/wi/FPqCZe kJ7l/uVOI1W1Kx1+rLmqAvih9XGsFHje0mA5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lEzPcvhrFcSUS2jphTTXrDdK0NfzQIfmzGqv0Bv2WMH6gYB831l4mi5LZZJ5wSIZvW 2no0L+s2UXUkNVoA5VZp+LExI1Q1chP43rDzwtlqV8dMkGXtoFv2ivLAWPKW0zODJpjX C8TzU/cZm0a9CRL5k1biTyRu8kSRuaAIIA3/I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.200.139 with SMTP id ew11mr8402251ibb.128.1296574889867; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:41:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.10.200 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:41:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <995726.5146.qm@web161208.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 15:41:29 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wisdom of using ":" in property name From: Stephen Connolly To: Ant Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Damn you Peter, you beat me to the punch! On 1 February 2011 14:41, Peter Reilly wrote: > : and =3D and ' ' are used to separate the key from value in java propert= y files. > so, not a good thing to use in property values. > > Peter > > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Vimil Saju wrote: >> you're nuts, don't use : in property names! :P >> >> --- On Tue, 2/1/11, Steele, Richard wrote: >> >>> From: Steele, Richard >>> Subject: Wisdom of using ":" in property name >>> To: user@ant.apache.org >>> Date: Tuesday, February 1, 2011, 5:53 AM >>> For better or for worse, I'm using >>> ":" as a separator character in my >>> property names as part of a set of reusable build >>> files.=A0 The part before >>> the ":" indicates which build file the property is defined >>> in. >>> >>> I've come across at least one incompatibility doing this, >>> however, and that >>> is with the Bundlor tool (from SpringSource) for generating >>> OSGi manifests. >>> The issue appears to be that Bundlor uses the ":" character >>> for its own >>> purposes and is getting confused by my property naming >>> convention.=A0 I'm >>> faced with several choices: >>> >>> 1. Use something other than Bundlor, like bnd. >>> 2. Work around or patch Bundlor to make it work with my >>> property naming >>> convention. >>> 3. Use some other naming convention (or none at all). >>> >>> None of these choices are all that appealing, but if the >>> Ant community says >>> something like "you're nuts, don't use : in property names" >>> that will >>> obviously push me towards #3. >>> >>> (If you're curious, I chose ":" both because the obvious >>> choice of "." >>> wasn't distinct enough from many built-in property names, >>> and because I also >>> use ":" in my target names.) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Rich >>> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org