ant-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dominique Devienne" <ddevie...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Enforcing "depends" order for 3rd-party targets?
Date Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:33:01 GMT
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Alexey Solofnenko
> {depends(clean) ^ depends(build)} -> {depends(clean) - (depends(clean) ^
> depends(build))} -> {depends(build) - (depends(clean) ^ depends(build))}"
>
> This effectively means that all targets in {depends(clean) - (depends(clean)
> ^ depends(build))} should depend on all targets in {depends(clean) ^
> depends(build)}.... And it is assuming that none of the other targets impose
> other ordering rules. However it is an important feature that is required
> for a real parallel executor. If you know a solution, please let me know.

You've lost me Alexey. Could you explain your ^, -, -> notations some
more please? I can appreciate that mixing ordered and unordered
dependencies could result in impossibilities, but these could be
detected and flag as errors, no? --DD

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message