Return-Path: 
 <user-return-62588-apmail-ant-user-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 62353 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2007 14:07:47 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Oct 2007 14:07:47 -0000
Received: (qmail 24714 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2007 14:07:34 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-user-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 23788 invoked by uid 500); 11 Oct 2007 14:07:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Users List" <user.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Users List" <user@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list user@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 23777 invoked by uid 99); 11 Oct 2007 14:07:31 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:07:31 -0700
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [192.6.10.2] (HELO colossus.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.2)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:07:31 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CAE6BA1F
	for <user@ant.apache.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:06:40 +0100 (BST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com
Received: from colossus.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (colossus.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with LMTP id HQFuX7gwZrrT for <user@ant.apache.org>;
	Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:06:39 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ha-node-br2.hpl.hp.com (ha-node-br2.hpl.hp.com [16.25.144.57])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by colossus.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51F46BA08
	for <user@ant.apache.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:06:38 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [16.25.171.118] ([16.25.171.118])
	by ha-node-br2.hpl.hp.com (8.14.1/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l9BE6LxU007071
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <user@ant.apache.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:06:21 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <470E2DDD.1030403@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 15:06:21 +0100
From: Steve Loughran <stevel@apache.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ant Users List <user@ant.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Fileset Evaluation
References: <06080D44730F41428BAF2168FA8BDD800141B56F@icsrv02.icongmbh.de>
In-Reply-To: <06080D44730F41428BAF2168FA8BDD800141B56F@icsrv02.icongmbh.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-HPL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-HPL-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-HPL-MailScanner-From: stevel@apache.org
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Knuplesch wrote:
> If I define a fileset via a patternset and a id like that:
> 
>     <patternset id="dopecopy.configpattern.kunde">
>       <exclude name="javahelp/**"/>
>       <exclude name="imagesText/**"/>
>       <exclude name="dcpcall.xml"/>
>       <exclude name="mffafp.pro"/>
>     </patternset>
>     
>     <fileset id="dopecopy.configfiles.kunde" dir="${dope.configdir.kunde}">
>       <patternset refid="dopecopy.configpattern.kunde"></patternset>
>     </fileset>
> 
> And now I add another file to the fileset-dir: ${dope.configdir.kunde}
> E.g. like that:
> 
>       <jar destfile="${dope.configdir.kunde}/editorHelp.jar">
>           <fileset dir="${dope.configdir.kunde}/javahelp/editor" />
>       </jar>
> 
> 
> Will editorHelp.jar be copied or not?
>     
>     <copy todir="${dope.target.dir}/config">
>       <fileset refid="dopecopy.configfiles.kunde" />
>     </copy>
> 
> Is editorHelp.jar part of the fileset, even if it did not exist, when I created the fileset?
> Why?
> In my case, I think it was part of the fileset and I don't understand why!
> 
> In other words:
> When will filesets be evaluated? Waht are the rules?

They're generally evaluated the first time theyre a used, and (probably) 
not re-evaluated.

to get reevaluation in, dont cache the fileset but explicitly redeclare 
it again.

-- 
Steve Loughran                  http://www.1060.org/blogxter/publish/5
Author: Ant in Action           http://antbook.org/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@ant.apache.org